ISSN: 17571898
First published in 2009
2 issues per volume
Volume 9 Issue 2
Cover Date: October 2017
Are victims to blame? Youth, gender and moral discourse on online risk
purchase PDF
Authors:  Ana Jorge And  Lorleen Farrugia 
DOI: 10.1386/cjcs.9.2.285_1

Keywords
discourse,online risk,digital media,cross-cultural,young people,responsibility

Abstract
This article takes a discourse analysis frame to understand how young people’s norms and moral evaluations of their practices on digital media are culturally negotiated between their own and their peers’ experiences, parental concerns, awareness programmes and media representations. It draws on focus groups and interviews with 171 participants aged 13–16 from nine European countries, analysing how young people position themselves towards online experiences, particularly bullying, sexual communication and contact. While teenagers can sympathize with victims of bullying, especially if they perceive them as vulnerable, they can blame older teenagers, girls or parents for initiating or being co-responsible for risks young victims are involved in. They are judged as in failing, when they choose to not comply with self-protection and self-vigilance (Giddens 1991, Dobson and Ringrose 2015, Gill and Scharf 2011), which can be detected in young people’s moral discourses as a successful way of being and behaving online.
Tags:
Your tags: Please login or register if you don't have a user account.
Latest news
19th October 2018
European Journal of American Culture 37.3 is now available
Read more Read more
18th October 2018
CFP: EUPOP 2019
Read more Read more
18th October 2018
Performing Ethos: An International Journal of Ethics in Theatre & Performance 8.1 is now available
Read more Read more